what a way to even start a blog!! ethics vs. morality!! seemingly, to some, interchangeable words, but to me, they are different. Morals come from who we are and the standards we set for ourselves - the knowing of right and wrong. Ethics is more the study of issues that could cross moral boundaries. To be put simpler, morals are from the Lord and ethics from the theology. Anyways - why am I talking about ethics/morals? For 2 reasons, really. I just read a book where, in the end, the man helps kill his wife, whom he very dearly loves, all because she asked him to help her out of her pain and he is convicted of 1st degree murder. Now this presents us with MANY issues to look at. Euthanasia, for one, which I am totally and completely against in any way, shape or form. But it also takes a look at love. How much do you love someone and how far will you go to making sure that they are happy? Ugh! I'm glad this was a fictional book!! I love Scot more than I can say, but I could never end his life just to put him out of his misery. That's something you do with your old dog, not anyone you love. But it sparked some interesting dinner conversation, that's for sure. Part of the book, too, was convicting the man of 1st degree murder. Scot said that yes, of course he murdered his wife. I, of course, disagreed. (even though what he did was wrong, i don't see it as murder) So then we were debating the difference between killing and murdering. I told him that in order to murder, you had to kill. but just because you've killed someone doesn't necessitate the fact that you have committed murder. I gave him examples of accidents with guns or cars. Protecting yourself and having these scenes end in a death. If it wasn't with malicious intent or premeditation, it wasn't murder. He held to the fact that the 2 words were interchangeable. So, as always when it's a war between words, we turned to trusty Mr Webster and indeed, he supported my definitions. But Scot still thought that the husband was guilty of 1st degree murder and that's fine. It's a fictional scenario. Thankfully.
The other topic of conversation last night was not fictional at all. In Denver, there is an 8 year old boy who has decided he wants to go to school as a girl.
Here's a link to the local paper that covered the story if you want to read up on it. Anyways - we got into discussion about how an 8 year old can even think that there's an option to become something else?!?! We thought about parenting or nature vs. nurture or even maybe some hormonal imbalance. We decided that there was something obviously wrong there, emotionally or otherwise, and we discussed how wrong it seemed, and what a bind it would put the school and other parents of classmates. We also got to talking about the difference between sex and gender. Well, the difference I saw in the two words at least. Again, Scot didn't see the difference, but this time Mr Webster wasn't as supportive of my definitions even though the definitions for the 2 words are different, they weren't different enough for Scot. haha. Oh well.
Anyways, I just got to thinking about how many ethical and moral issues there are out in this sinful world that we have to deal with and sort out. Obviously, in my head, killing (unless it is for pure self defense and there is no other way out) is wrong. Also, as a soon-to-be parent, letting your child decide on his own that he now wants to be a girl seems utterly absurd! Just the fact that there would be such a discussion seems absurd! What happens when the kid is 13 and decides he now wants to go back to being a boy? I understand that I'm not in that parent's position, and I can only pray that I won't ever be, but it just seems so unnatural.
So this is somewhat a rambling babbling rant at society in general - I think I just needed to write it all down so it would stop swimming around in my brain. Haha. I'm glad these are issues that I only have to read and think about, not ones I actually have to act on. :)